nanog mailing list archives
Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation
From: David Lesher <wb8foz () nrk com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 12:02:19 -0400 (EDT)
Unnamed Administration sources reported that Brett Frankenberger said:
Real CLECs -- those that try to serve a broad based market, rather than hack togethor a contrived market that will result in a high ration o finbound to outbound calls, will do fine in the absence of reciprocal compensation.
Suffice to say, senior communications attorneys disagree with you. If you wish to debate that (non-NANOG) issue, come join the CYBERTELECOM-L list where it's 100% on-topic. -- A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz () nrk com & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
Current thread:
- HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation William Allen Simpson (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Jeff Mcadams (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation David Lesher (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation M. David Leonard (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Brett Frankenberger (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation M. David Leonard (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Bill Woodcock (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Nathan Stratton (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Brett Frankenberger (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Masataka Ohta (Sep 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Chip Sharp (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation David Lesher (Sep 14)
- HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Robert Cannon (Sep 18)