Re: (O-T)

[Dave McKay <dave () sneakerz org>]

Agreed, 
Please excuse my previous statement about level3 engineers.  It was ment
to be a private reply.  (damn group reply!!)  Its a personal opinion, 
and should be taken as such.  (Its possible, and most likely true that 
l3 is a good provider, I just happened to speak with a not-so-bright
engineer.)

dan () netrail net (dan () netrail net) wrote:
> I've found that the vast majority of very large ISPs have clueful
> engineers. Hoever, like many routing problems, it's not a question that a
> host exists, it's a question of reachability. Many times there are clueful
> engineers, but there are so many layers between them and customers, they
> are very hard to access. 
>
> Daniel Golding
> Director of R&D    "I'm not evil. I'm just drawn that way"
> NetRail, Inc.              
> 1-888-NetRail
>
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Dave McKay wrote:
>
> > Good connectivity, but clueless engineers.  Problem solving is not their
> > strong point.
> >
> > Stephen Burd (sburd () tm net) wrote:
> > > hey, can someone tell me what they know about Level 3 Communications please?
> > >
> > > rsvp privately
> > >
> > > thank you
> > >
> > > -Stephen
> >
> > >
> > -- 
> > Dave McKay
> > dave () sneakerz org
> > Network Engineer - Google Inc.

-- 
Dave McKay
dave () sneakerz org
Network Engineer - Google Inc.