nanog mailing list archives
Re: White House Net security summit
From: Wayne Bouchard <web () typo org>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 18:35:11 -0700
Is security in an environment where new applications are installed on an almost daily basis something you can really regulate? In some regards, the thought of Washington getting involved here scares me. On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 03:03:55PM -0700, Sean Donelan wrote:
I guess if you snooze you loose. For anyone who didn't know from MSNBC "A group of key high-tech executives agreed at a White House meeting earlier today to move forward on a plan to set minimum security standards for big companies that connect to the Internet, MSNBC.com has learned. The meeting was attended by Microsoft, IBM, Oracle, Boeing, the National Security Agency and U.S. Secretary of Commerce Norm Mineta."
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Wayne Bouchard [Immagine Your ] web () typo org [Company Name Here] Network Engineer http://www.typo.org/~web/resume.html ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- White House Net security summit Sean Donelan (Sep 21)
- Re: White House Net security summit Wayne Bouchard (Sep 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: White House Net security summit Mike Bostardi (Sep 22)
- Re: White House Net security summit Steve Sobol (Sep 23)
- Re: White House Net security summit John Fraizer (Sep 23)
- Re: White House Net security summit Steve Sobol (Sep 23)
- Re: White House Net security summit Steve Sobol (Sep 23)