nanog mailing list archives
Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report
From: John Fraizer <nanog () EnterZone Net>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 22:49:52 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, John Todd wrote:
Take a look at: http://www.fox-den.com/routes/
Had to look at it real hard until I realized your graphs are growing to the right vs the standard MRTG output.
at least,) and the sudden expectation that all Internet traffic is mission-critical and mustmustmust always be available. The bubble of hype is finally moving down the hose and causing operational issues such as this.
It is an operation issue for Ciscos perhaps, and sure, it increases the time it takes to get a full view when a peering session is reset but, the last time I checked (a week ago), gated and zebra on the PC router running on an inexpensive pentium class machine with 256MB of memory had NO problem whatsoever with 250K prefixes. The Juniper M5 and M10 in bare bones configuration have 256MB and there is a 768MB option. IMHO, unless Cisco starts jumping through the hoops for providers, the number of "Powered by Cisco" banners we see is going to fade quickly. --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc
Current thread:
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Roeland M.J. Meyer (Sep 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report John Todd (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report John Fraizer (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Andrew Brown (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Thomas Marshall Eubanks (Sep 23)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report John Fraizer (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Sean Donelan (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Sean Donelan (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report nicholas harteau (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report jlewis (Sep 22)