nanog mailing list archives
Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation (fwd)
From: Steve Sobol <sjsobol () NorthShoreTechnologies net>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:04:00 -0400
Nathan Stratton wrote:
I've been thinking about this and I think the CLECS and ISP's might be benefitted by the passing of this. I think this bill will do more to hurt the ILECS then help them in the long run.The ILECs are like that, don't forget it was the ILECs who wanted reciprocal compensation and fought to make it as high as possible so they could make more money from CAPs like MFS.
I heard, on an Akron (Ohio) radio station today, an ad taken out by the American ISP Association urging people to call their Akron-area congresscritter (Tom Sawyer) to try to sway him to vote AGAINST HR 4445. Things that make you go Hmmm... I might be misinformed, but I thought HR4445 would benefit ISPs in some way. -- North Shore Technologies, Cleveland, OH http://NorthShoreTechnologies.net Steve Sobol, BOFH - President, Chief Website Architect and Janitor Linux Instructor, PC/LAN Program, Natl. Institute of Technology, Akron, OH sjsobol () NorthShoreTechnologies net - 888.480.4NET - 216.619.2NET
Current thread:
- HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation (fwd) multics (Sep 24)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation (fwd) Nathan Stratton (Sep 24)
- (OT) RSVP! Stephen Burd (Sep 24)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation (fwd) Steve Sobol (Sep 25)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation (fwd) Jeff Mcadams (Sep 26)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation (fwd) Henry R. Linneweh (Sep 26)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation (fwd) Nathan Stratton (Sep 24)