RE: IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting)

[Vadim Antonov <avg () kotovnik com>]

On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Christian Kuhtz wrote:

> Admittedly an interesting thought to encourage propagation, but then
> again, you can't treat an IPv6 migration as if IPv4 is just going to
> disappear overnight. So, that type of co-existance might actually be a
> good thing.  Interop is typically where most issues occur.

Are we building production networks or doing experiments?  IPv6 exhibits
no added functionality over IPv4 + NAT, so why bother?

> Pure v4 or v6 stacks are typically no brainers.

Yeah, sure, that's why there are so many broken IPv4 stacks around. 

---vadim