nanog mailing list archives
RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20
From: "Matt Levine" <matt () deliver3 com>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 18:41:59 -0400
Netname: HALLIBURTON Netblock: 34.0.0.0 - 34.255.255.255 I have a hunch Halliburton oil doesn't need 16 million ips.. I also have a hunch that they wont be getting revoked anytime soon ;) __ Matt Levine <matt () deliver3 com> "I used to think that the brain was the most wonderful organ in my body. Then I realized who was telling me this." -- Emo Phillips -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Kyle C. Bacon Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 6:21 PM To: mike harrison Cc: John K. Doyle, Jr.; nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20
It seems a poor reasons for acquiring a company, as they really do not "own" the address space. --Mike--
That is an interesting comment, has anyone ever heard of ARIN revoking IP's from a entity who no longer meets current ARIN criteria for a give size allocation? Or is it infact the case that once you get the IP space as long as you keep paying for it you get to keep it? in essence you do "own" it as long as you keep the capitalist portion of ARIN happy and pay your annual IP bills? (no offense to those ARIN workforce members among us). K mike harrison <meuon@higher To: "John K. Doyle, Jr." <John.Doyle () oracle com> tech.net> cc: nanog () merit edu Sent by: Subject: Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 owner-nanog@m erit.edu 04/09/2001 06:07 PM John said:
Well, you could acquire a company that already has one. :)
That has been the suggestion from several people. I've even considered it, especially when one of my local competitors has a /18, and they are much smaller than we are. We 'NAT' an incredible amount of dial-up and commercial customers to reduce our need for public IP's, and trends thankfully went to customers WANTING to be NAT'd and Proxied for 'firewall' reasons, with only a few public IP's. It seems a poor reasons for acquiring a company, as they really do not "own" the address space. --Mike--
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20, (continued)
- RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 mike harrison (Apr 09)
- RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Roeland Meyer (Apr 09)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 mike harrison (Apr 09)
- RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Jade E. Deane (Apr 09)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 mike harrison (Apr 09)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Majdi S. Abbas (Apr 09)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Hank Nussbacher (Apr 09)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 John Fraizer (Apr 10)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Majdi S. Abbas (Apr 09)
- RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Segal, Mark (Apr 09)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Kyle C. Bacon (Apr 09)
- RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Matt Levine (Apr 09)
- RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 David Schwartz (Apr 09)
- RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 mike harrison (Apr 09)
- RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Bill Nickless (Apr 09)
- RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Matt Levine (Apr 09)
- RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 mike harrison (Apr 09)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Eric A. Hall (Apr 09)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Andy Dills (Apr 09)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Eric Gauthier (Apr 09)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Eric A. Hall (Apr 09)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 bmanning (Apr 09)