nanog mailing list archives

Re: What does 95th %tile mean?


From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan () fugawi net>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 16:07:37 -0400



Isn't in+out a more fair representation of usage? I've always assumed that
this was the standard to be honest. Thank god I'm not the billing person.
I think Exodus does in+out.

-M

At 03:06 PM 4/19/2001 -0400, Thomas Kernen wrote:


I know one company in Europe that uses the in + out model.

Thomas

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Rubenstein" <alex () corp nac net>
To: <nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 10:09 AM
Subject: What does 95th %tile mean?


>
> I've gotten myself into an argument with a provider about the definition of
> 'industry-standard 95th percentile method.'
>
> To me, this means the following:
>
> a) take the number of bytes xfered over a 5 minute period, and determine
> rate for both the inbound and outbound. Store this in your favorite
> data-store.
>
> b) at billing time, presumably on the first of the month or some other
> monthly increment, take all the samples, sort them from greatest to least,
> hacking off the top 5% of samples. Actually, this is done twice, once for
> inbound, once for outbound. Then, take the higher of those two, and multiply
> it by your favorite $ multiple (ie, $500 per megabit per second, or $1 per
> kilobit per second, etc).
>
> I think that most people agree with the above; the issue we are running into > is one rogue provider who is billing this at in + out, not the greater of in
> or out.
>
> How is everyone else doing it? Specifically, larger folks (UU, Sprint, CW,
> Exodus/FGC, GX, Qwest, L3)
>
> Thanks!
>



Regards,

--
Martin Hannigan                    hannigan () fugawi net
Fugawi Networks                    Founder/Director of Implementation
Boston, MA                         http://www.fugawi.net
Ph: 617.742.2693                   Fax: 617.742.2300



Current thread: