nanog mailing list archives
Re: Custom Wireless Solution
From: Charles Scott <cscott () gaslightmedia com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 07:42:09 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Miles Fidelman wrote:
On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Wojtek Zlobicki wrote:Is this plausible. Is there any technology out there that uses public spectrum over a 6 mile distance ?Dave Hughes did a study of wireless options for rural applications, funded by NSF I believe. Some fairly current results, including vendors lists and such, are at http://wireless.oldcolo.com/
Be sure to pay attention to the "Fresnel Zone" references in this document. While not particularly accurate, it does refer to the problem of Fresnel Zone intrusion that can cause problems with your path. In other words, an optical line-of-sight path is not necessarily a good RF path, so don't bother installing it if you're not going to engineer it. Chuck
Current thread:
- Custom Wireless Solution Wojtek Zlobicki (Apr 22)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Lincoln Dale (Apr 22)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Wojtek Zlobicki (Apr 22)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Dominic J. Eidson (Apr 22)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Mohan Sundar (Apr 23)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Simon Lockhart (Apr 23)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution poptix (Apr 29)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Lincoln Dale (Apr 23)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Mohan Sundar (Apr 23)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Eric Whitehill (Apr 23)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Lincoln Dale (Apr 22)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Miles Fidelman (Apr 23)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Charles Scott (Apr 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Custom Wireless Solution Mike Schoenecker (Apr 25)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution John Kristoff (Apr 25)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Charles Sprickman (Apr 25)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution John Kristoff (Apr 25)
- RE: Custom Wireless Solution Roeland Meyer (Apr 25)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Steve Sobol (Apr 30)