nanog mailing list archives
Re: black hat .cn networks
From: Roger Marquis <marquis () roble com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 17:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
Walter Prue <prue () ISI EDU> wrote:
The folks in the US who counterattack might be well advised to reconsider doing so. I would imagine that traffic from the US would be closely monitored. Any new hacking tricks that these counterattacks might use would then be recorded and analyzed. These techniques could then be used by them to further attack the US.
Does anyone know if these China scares are for real? The probability they are simply Pentagon/Administration propaganda seems too high to discount. I ask because we've seen no increase in the (already substantial) number of scans from CN/KR/HK/... netblocks. Does any hard evidence exist? -- Roger Marquis Roble Systems Consulting http://www.roble.com/
Current thread:
- RE: black hat .cn networks, (continued)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Aaron Dewell (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Walter Prue (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Segal, Mark (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Brett Frankenberger (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks k claffy (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks George William Herbert (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Richard A. Steenbergen (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Shawn McMahon (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Shawn McMahon (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Roger Marquis (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Kevin Day (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Roeland Meyer (Apr 30)