nanog mailing list archives

Re: telnet vs ssh on Core equipment , looking for reasons why ?


From: Rafi Sadowsky <rafi-nanog () meron openu ac il>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 08:43:09 +0300 (IDT)



On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Charles Sprickman wrote:


On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Kevin Steves wrote:

On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Charles Sprickman wrote:
:6) Finding a unix ssh that supports 3DES and DES.

 DES(not 3DES) is a compile time option for SSH1
(default is not to support DES)

 Try to convince to person in charge of SSH that even SSH1+DES while weak
is much better than cleartext tel-net ....


-       Rafi



:
:I curse those OpenSSH folks for making me have to trudge through the code
:to find out how to get DES working...

DES is supported in openssh for protocol 1 in the client with ssh -c des.

Ooops.  The FreeBSD port I built from is trailing a bit:

spork@tiny[~]$ ssh -V
SSH Version OpenSSH_2.2.0, protocol versions 1.5/2.0.

And:

spork@tiny[~]$ ssh -c des 216.223.x.x
Unknown cipher type 'des'

However it appears newer versions include it, but warn you:

oscar[/var/spool/tftp/ios]# ssh -c des -l foo 216.223.x.x
Warning: use of DES is strongly discouraged due to cryptographic weaknesses
foo@216.223.x.x's password:

Sorry for the noise,

Charles

also, does anyone curse cisco for refusing to support ssh protocol 2?
they have much more resources than the openssh team.





Current thread: