nanog mailing list archives
Re: Code Red growth stats
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 16:18:35 -0400
I
I ran a little script on the totals reported by www.incidents.org, calculating the ratio between successive samples. (The latest graph I could find, as of 1615 EDT, ended at 1400 EDT.) There was a period of steady exponential growth in there, but it seems to be tailing off. That's consistent with another report posted here. 2.06579 1.6051 1.96429 1.80404 1.78163 1.81081 1.66331 1.67091 1.6844 1.63127 1.4773 1.29124 1.15538 --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
Current thread:
- Code Red growth stats k claffy (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats Dave Stewart (Aug 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Code Red growth stats Steven M. Bellovin (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats k claffy (Aug 01)
- Message not available
- Re: Code Red growth stats Dave Stewart (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats michael (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats Christopher A. Woodfield (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats Scott Stursa (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats Joe Shaw (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 01)
- Re: Code Red growth stats k claffy (Aug 01)