nanog mailing list archives
Re: MPLS VPNs or not?
From: Christian Kuhtz <ck () arch bellsouth net>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 09:56:20 -0400
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 05:11:41AM -0500, Andy Walden wrote:
I think its pretty well known that multiple routing tables, ala 2547-bis, is not scalable.
[..] I think it's pretty well known that the point you mention is FUD. Besides, it's not really intended to be 'multiple tables' with multiple instances of routing processes.. it's an indexed table run by the same routing process. Take a look at the mpls () uu net archives for a rather exhaustive and exhausting discussion of this very subject, or provide facts as to what specifically doesn't scale. -- Christian Kuhtz <ck () arch bellsouth net> -wk, <ck () gnu org> -hm Sr. Architect, Engineering & Architecture, BellSouth.net, Atlanta, GA, U.S. "I speak for myself only.""
Current thread:
- MPLS VPNs or not? Hank Nussbacher (Aug 06)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Andy Walden (Aug 07)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Thomas P. Brisco (Aug 07)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Christian Kuhtz (Aug 07)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Andy Walden (Aug 07)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Christian Kuhtz (Aug 07)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Andy Walden (Aug 07)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Christian Kuhtz (Aug 07)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Andy Walden (Aug 07)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Andy Walden (Aug 07)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Randy Bush (Aug 07)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Christian Kuhtz (Aug 07)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Randy Bush (Aug 07)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Christian Kuhtz (Aug 07)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Vadim Antonov (Aug 07)