nanog mailing list archives
Re: NOC servers with public/private ip address
From: "Wojtek Zlobicki" <wojtekz () idirect com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 17:56:54 -0400
Although I am almost religious that internet routers should NEVER have private address in the routing table
That isn't quite correct. Internet routers should never "advertise" private IP blocks to the global Intenet, I've never heard of anyone stating that they should not have them in their routing table. I've worked in a few NOCs in my short life and the NOC has always been on an isolated private subnet. Acess to critical hardware was only allowed from behind that subnet. Private addressing adds an extra layer of security as well as saving valuable IP space.
Current thread:
- NOC servers with public/private ip address R Z (Aug 14)
- Re: NOC servers with public/private ip address Wojtek Zlobicki (Aug 14)
- Re: NOC servers with public/private ip address Arman Khalili (Aug 14)
- Re: NOC servers with public/private ip address Kevin Loch (Aug 14)
- Re: NOC servers with public/private ip address Greg Maxwell (Aug 15)
- Re: NOC servers with public/private ip address Andy Walden (Aug 15)
- Re: NOC servers with public/private ip address Greg Maxwell (Aug 15)
- Re: NOC servers with public/private ip address Wojtek Zlobicki (Aug 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: NOC servers with public/private ip address Roeland Meyer (Aug 14)
- Re: NOC servers with public/private ip address Christopher A. Woodfield (Aug 15)
- Re: NOC servers with public/private ip address Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 15)
- Re: NOC servers with public/private ip address Jeff Gehlbach (Aug 15)
- Re: NOC servers with public/private ip address Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 15)
- Re: NOC servers with public/private ip address Christopher A. Woodfield (Aug 15)