nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...)
From: RJ Atkinson <rja () inet org>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 12:04:36 -0400
At 11:37 23/08/01, Antony Antony wrote:
for those who interested in IPv6, Path MTU Discovery is not in IPv6 stack. To have end to end jumbo frames in native v6 we NAPs in the path should support jumbo frames.
More precisely, with IPv6 networks, either: (1) Path MTU Discovery is ALWAYS enabled and cannot be disabled XOR (2) the sending system never sends an IP packet larger than 1280 bytes. [Source: RFC-2460, Section 5, Page 24] Ran rja () inet org
Current thread:
- Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...), (continued)
- Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...) RJ Atkinson (Aug 22)
- Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...) Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 22)
- Re: Ethernet NAPs RJ Atkinson (Aug 23)
- Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...) John Kristoff (Aug 23)
- Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...) Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 23)
- Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...) John Kristoff (Aug 23)
- Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...) RJ Atkinson (Aug 23)
- Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...) Miquel van Smoorenburg (Aug 23)
- Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...) RJ Atkinson (Aug 23)
- Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...) Antony Antony (Aug 23)
- Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...) RJ Atkinson (Aug 23)
- Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...) Antony (Aug 23)
- Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...) Greg Maxwell (Aug 23)
- Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...) Greg Maxwell (Aug 23)
- Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...) RJ Atkinson (Aug 23)