nanog mailing list archives
RE: multi-homing fixes
From: "Mark Radabaugh - Amplex" <mark () amplex net>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 15:45:02 -0400
"Multihomed customers generate LESS technical support rather than more?" Perhaps in an outage instance they do. When they have a routing issue, it can become a finger-pointing match between their upstreams and thus, it generates 100% more technical support for the upstream who doesn't have the problem. --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc
There was a question mark after that statement :-) So far FUBARS by provider A have not generated any extra technical support for provider B. At least in a simple multihome situation it isn't too hard to tell who is hosing things using online routing tools. It may generate more traffic to B but I don't see it causing a support issue. Mark
Current thread:
- RE: multi-homing fixes, (continued)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Randy Bush (Aug 27)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Mark Radabaugh - Amplex (Aug 27)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Randy Bush (Aug 27)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Patrick Greenwell (Aug 27)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Charles Sprickman (Aug 27)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Randy Bush (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Leo Bicknell (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Mark Radabaugh (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixes John Fraizer (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Mark Radabaugh - Amplex (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 24)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Howard C. Berkowitz (Aug 24)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 29)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Clayton Fiske (Aug 29)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 29)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Henry Yen (Aug 24)
- RE: multi-homing fixes David Schwartz (Aug 24)
- RE: multi-homing fixes David Schwartz (Aug 24)