nanog mailing list archives
Re: multi-homing fixed
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 01:15:56 -0400
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 00:05:58 EDT, jlewis () lewis org said:
Redundancy is only one reason to multihome. More paths (hopefully at least one per destination that doesn't suck) is another big one, and
We had some truly sucking paths to some destinations yesterday (15000ms over our OC-3) until our chief NOC monkey said enough was enough and nuked the BGP session with the other end. Happen to have any pointers to "this path sucks no matter what BGP says" tools? Especially for the case of the *real* problem being 2 or 3 AS's down the chain? Or does everybody's noc monkeys wait for the "foobar.com sucks" phone calls? Valdis Kletnieks Operating Systems Analyst Virginia Tech
Current thread:
- RE: multi-homing fixed Larry Sheldon (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixed David Hares (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixed Leo Bicknell (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixed David Hares (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixed jlewis (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixed Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixed Leo Bicknell (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixed Randy Bush (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixed Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 29)
- Re: multi-homing fixed Alex Bligh (Aug 29)
- Re: multi-homing fixed Patrick Greenwell (Aug 29)
- RE: multi-homing fixed David Hares (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixed Howard C. Berkowitz (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixed arman khalili (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixed Roy (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixed Howard C. Berkowitz (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixed Alex Pilosov (Aug 28)