nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering Agreements
From: "Vincent J. Bono" <vbono () vinny org>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 15:35:30 -0500
Actually, I think it is a waste of everyone elses time. The legal folks seem to enjoy it though. -vb ----- Original Message ----- From: "renster" <ren () internet rockstar org> To: "Robert Tryce" <rtryce () deadnet net>; <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Re: Peering Agreements
Peering agreements for a public peering arrangement are a waste of legal
time.
When there is a cost associated with termination of a circuit then it
makes
more sense. Most peering agreements have the termination without cause clause
regardless.
YMMV. -ren At 03:00 PM 12/13/2001 -0500, Robert Tryce wrote:I have a question on public peering agreements. I have seen some
providers
using them while others are not. What is the general opinion on peering agreements? Are most peering agreements used mainly for private peering? Also, what are the pros and cons and what kind of protection should I expect from such an agreement? Thank you in advance, Robert Tryce
Current thread:
- Peering Agreements Robert Tryce (Dec 13)
- Re: Peering Agreements Leo Bicknell (Dec 13)
- RE: Peering Agreements Daniel Golding (Dec 13)
- Re: Peering Agreements Rich Fulton (Dec 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Peering Agreements renster (Dec 13)
- Re: Peering Agreements Vincent J. Bono (Dec 13)