nanog mailing list archives
Re: T3 Latency
From: Charles Scott <cscott () gaslightmedia com>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 09:33:02 -0500 (EST)
Matthew: Appears to be a typo in your final number of 130 mi/sec, but I get where you're going with this. I'm just having a problem trying to figure out how I end up with a couple thousand fiber miles from Northern Michigan to Chicago. Should be interesting to sort this one out. Thanks, Chuck On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Matthew F. Ringel wrote:
The rule of thumb I use is that the speed of light in fiber-optic cable is roughly 2x10^8 m/sec. 2x10^8 m/sec = 200,000,000 m/sec = 200,000 km/sec = 200 km/msec =~ 130 mi/sec I once worked with a customer whose first hop out was ~30ms, regardless of the load on the line (a t3, iirc). Sure enough, he was on a very large SONET ring that travelled the north-south length of the US roughly twice before his traffic went elsewhere. ......Matthew
Current thread:
- T3 Latency Charles Scott (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Chris Cappuccio (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Charles Scott (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Paul Bradford (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency John Kristoff (Feb 24)
- Message not available
- RED deployment testing John Kristoff (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Charles Scott (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Chris Cappuccio (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: T3 Latency Walter Prue (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Matthew F. Ringel (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Charles Scott (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Matthew F. Ringel (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Wayne Bouchard (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Charles Scott (Feb 24)
- RE: T3 Latency Aaron Moreau-Cook (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Matthew F. Ringel (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Nipper, Arnold (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Deepak Jain (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Charles Scott (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Jeff Mcadams (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Charles Scott (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency dave o'leary (Feb 24)