nanog mailing list archives
Re: Network for Sale
From: Mike Hughes <mike () smashing net>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:11:57 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On the same breath, why aren't people using route-servers at NAPs?
We had a route-server at LINX. However, they were taken down because of lack of interest. People just wanted to manage their own BGP config, and didn't go for a third party being in the loop in a big way. A RIPE NCC RIS collector box has now taken the place of the route server at LINX, and as I recall, more people peer with that than they did the route server. Mike
Current thread:
- Re: Network for Sale, (continued)
- Re: Network for Sale John Fraizer (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Daniel L. Golding (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Jon Stanley (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Steve Sobol (Feb 24)
- RE: Network for Sale Nathan Stratton (Feb 24)
- RE: Network for Sale Daniel L. Golding (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale John Fraizer (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Paul Vixie (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Adrian Chadd (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Bill Woodcock (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Mike Hughes (Feb 24)
- any idea how to reach a human at the .us domain registry? Miles Fidelman (Feb 24)
- Re: any idea how to reach a human at the .us domain registry? Martin Hannigan (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Paul Vixie (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Kevin Oberman (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Roy (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Nathan Stratton (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Brandon Ross (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Timothy Brown (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Brandon Ross (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Nathan Stratton (Feb 24)