nanog mailing list archives
Re: Re:Update for noc .nl problem..
From: John Fraizer <nanog () Overkill EnterZone Net>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 16:55:22 -0500 (EST)
On 23 Feb 2001, CARL P HIRSCH wrote:
I'm curious - how many ISPs hold to this kind of policy of being tight-lipped until subpoenaed? Personally, I'm kind of glad to see this response from @home. I know I would want to see an ISP I used do the same thing if confronted by The Law. Maybe that's just the Bill of Rights lover in me. Having said that, it sucks that they're forcing you to get the lawyers and the cops involved. I'd often prefer to see things handled on an informal basis of professional courtesy. Especially when real damage is done such as in your case. -carl hirsch network analyst sargent & lundy llc
We won't release information but, we certainly will freeze log files and perhaps even thump the customer on the head with the "Bright Platinum Baseball Bat of Truth" until the subpoena does arrive. --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc
Current thread:
- Update for noc .nl problem.. Scott Walker (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re:Update for noc .nl problem.. CARL P HIRSCH (Feb 24)
- Re: Re:Update for noc .nl problem.. John Fraizer (Feb 24)
- Re: Update for noc .nl problem.. Scott Walker (Feb 24)
- Re:Update for noc .nl problem.. J Bacher (Feb 24)
- Re: Update for noc .nl problem.. Scott Walker (Feb 24)
- Re: Update for noc .nl problem.. Shawn McMahon (Feb 24)
- Message not available
- Re: Update for noc .nl problem.. Shawn McMahon (Feb 24)
- Message not available
- Re: Update for noc .nl problem.. Shawn McMahon (Feb 26)
- Re: Re:Update for noc .nl problem.. John Fraizer (Feb 24)