nanog mailing list archives
Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded
From: jamie rishaw <jamie () arpa com>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 17:35:54 -0500
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 02:14:12PM -0800, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
I count 141 ICANN "fully: accrediated domain name registrars, with an unknown number of secondary registrars due to systems like OpenSRS. These organizations collectively handle second-level name resolution for the overwhelming majority of the millions of .com, .net, and .org domains in use on the Internet. And while I haven't done a survey, I'd surmise that they overwhelmingly use BIND. Will these 141 organizations many of whose business relies on BIND be eligible for your fee-based list? Do they consitute providers of "critical infrastructure" in your eyes?
They're registrars. The don't directly provide DNS in any more critical a nature than any commercial DNS provider. And, since they're commercial organizations using BIND in a commercial aspect, I think they can cough up the money. -- i am jamie at arpa dot com .. and this is my .sig. core1.dns.microsoft.com# sho access-list 101 Extended IP access list 101 deny udp any any eq domain (874572345872345 matches)
Current thread:
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded, (continued)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Adam McKenna (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Steve Sobol (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Adam McKenna (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Joe Rhett (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Patrick Greenwell (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Paul A Vixie (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Adam Rothschild (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded jlewis (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Patrick Greenwell (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded jamie rishaw (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Patrick Greenwell (Feb 24)
- RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Vivien M. (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Jeffrey Meltzer (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Adrian Chadd (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Joe Rhett (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded mdevney (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Paul A Vixie (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Christian Kuhtz (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Bill Fumerola (Feb 24)