nanog mailing list archives

Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism)


From: Joshua Goodall <joshua () roughtrade net>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 21:13:35 +0100 (CET)



On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Mark Mentovai wrote:

Paul Vixie wrote:
Nope.  No part of ORBS is listed in AS7777.  The block which inspired this
thread is completely private to AS6461 and has to do with that network's AUG.

This sort of brings up an interesting point, though.  Has anyone ever
thought about adding a mechanism to BGP for advertising "anti-routes?"

Look at:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chen-bgp-route-filter-01.txt

however this functionality was not incorporated into the very recent
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-12.txt


Note that you still can't reach the nullroutes in this case if you have
the path 6461 702$, so this (or the alternative suggested,
community-tagging a nullroute feed for munging localprefs) would have to
be deployed amongst every above peer - with their cooperation - to avoid
asymmetric peculiarities.

Quite a lot of work just to allow orbs to probe you :) although the
generic case as addressed in the route-filter draft is quite interesting.

joshua





Current thread: