nanog mailing list archives
Re: Tricky BGP into IGP Question
From: Clayton Fiske <clay () bloomcounty org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 17:13:39 -0800
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 03:26:28PM -0800, Tim Wolfe wrote:
What is the preferred way to get transit customers routing information into your IGP so that BGP will announce the route to it's neighbors. 1===2a===2b====3 | 4 1 is the customer, announcing to 2a, who propogates 1's route to 2b and to 4. 2b will not announce the route to 3 as it doesn't have a route in it's routing table for 1's route. I was thinking about redistributing bgp into my igp using a route-map based on as-path filter, but that seems somewhat kludgy. What are you all doing to accomplish this or am I just missing something here?
Assuming each of those routers only speaks BGP to its direct neighbors currently, I'd say the most common solutions are route reflectors (and/or confederations) and fully-meshed BGP networks. The reason 3 doesn't see the route is because BGP doesn't propagate routes across multiple iBGP hops. If one of (2a, 2b, 3, 4) acts as a route reflector, and the others peer only with it, your route will get propagated to all of them. Alternately, if each of (2a, 2b, 3, 4) peers with each other directly, 1 will announce to 2a and 2a will propagate to all others. -c
Current thread:
- Tricky BGP into IGP Question Tim Wolfe (Feb 24)
- Re: Tricky BGP into IGP Question Anne Marcel (Feb 24)
- Re: Tricky BGP into IGP Question Clayton Fiske (Feb 24)
- RE: Tricky BGP into IGP Question Barry Raveendran Greene (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Tricky BGP into IGP Question Danny McPherson (Feb 24)
- Re: Tricky BGP into IGP Question Paul Donner (Feb 24)
- RE: Tricky BGP into IGP Question Tim Wolfe (Feb 24)