nanog mailing list archives
Re: Network diversity Software diversity
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () zocalo net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:59:15 -0800 (PST)
On 24 Jan 2001, Sean Donelan wrote: > Using FreeBSD and BIND on *ALL* your name servers may be just as > bad a practice as using Windows 2000 and Microsoft DNS on *ALL* > your name servers. You might try... using Solaris on some of the > boxes and AIX or Linux, or NetBSD on the others. Agreed. The Nominum GNS service is still using BIND code everywhere for the moment, but it's on heterogenous platforms, anyway... Every location has both Solaris-on-Sparc and NetBSD-on-Intel. I think they have a free or cheap way of using their network as secondaries, to try it out. That might be a good way to start. -Bill
Current thread:
- Network diversity Software diversity Sean Donelan (Feb 24)
- Re: Network diversity Software diversity Bill Woodcock (Feb 24)
- Re: Network diversity Software diversity Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Network diversity Software diversity Roeland Meyer (Feb 24)
- RE: Network diversity Software diversity Eric Germann (Feb 24)
- RE: Network diversity Software diversity Roeland Meyer (Feb 24)
- RE: Network diversity Software diversity Eric Germann (Feb 24)
- Re: Network diversity Software diversity Steve Sobol (Feb 24)
- Re: Network diversity Software diversity John Fraizer (Feb 24)
- RE: Network diversity Software diversity Roeland Meyer (Feb 24)
- Re: Network diversity Software diversity Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: Network diversity Software diversity Steve Sobol (Feb 24)