Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN?

[Stephen Stuart <stuart () mfnx net>]

> Using RFC1918 space also gets you an IP range where the outside world has
> no route to it -- Sorry, but no packets are not getting there, ergo no way
> to hack.
>
> Assuming various things that should be standard procedure -- dynamic NAT
> as opposed to static, blocking source routing, etc.

Blocking source routing should not be standard procedure; as I stated
earlier, source routing is much more valuable to me as a debugging
tool than RFC1918 addressing is as a "security" tool.

> At that point, just by use of simple routing, you've effectively
> eliminated 100% of attacks from the outside, and you only have to worry
> about inside.  The front door is secure, now work on the back door.

100%, huh? You sure must feel safe, then. Good for you! It's a nice
feeling when you have it.

Stephen