nanog mailing list archives
RE: When will 128M not be enough?
From: mike harrison <meuon () highertech net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 20:45:23 -0400 (EDT)
peering with another major provider? Do you just send half of your traffic to that provider to nowhere? If you want fault tolerance against connectivity losses, you need full routes.
I tried partial... after changing which upstream provider was my 'default route' a few times I quickly realized this was stupid. Ram and CPU is cheap enough to make full routes, even on a Cisco, a VERY desirable thing.
Current thread:
- Re: When will 128M not be enough?, (continued)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? mike harrison (Jul 14)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Geoff Huston (Jul 17)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Marko Karppinen (Jul 17)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Bill Woodcock (Jul 14)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? jlewis (Jul 15)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Andy Walden (Jul 15)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? jlewis (Jul 15)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Andy Walden (Jul 15)
- RE: When will 128M not be enough? David Schwartz (Jul 15)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Nipper, Arnold (Jul 15)
- RE: When will 128M not be enough? mike harrison (Jul 15)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Nipper, Arnold (Jul 15)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Christian Kuhtz (Jul 15)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Christopher A. Woodfield (Jul 15)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Majdi S. Abbas (Jul 15)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Robert E. Seastrom (Jul 15)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Andy Walden (Jul 15)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Vincent J. Bono (Jul 15)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Christian Kuhtz (Jul 15)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Arnold Nipper (Jul 15)