nanog mailing list archives
Re: X-10 and like behaviour.
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk () cybernothing org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 02:13:53 -0700
On 07/18/01, George Michaelson <ggm () apnic net> wrote:
Its probably not a big deal, and if selling bits on the wire makes money "the more the merrier" might be a catch-cry but I wondered if there was a NANOG dimension to these bloody irritating X-10 popups that curse me more and more. Is there some well understood non-edge solution to this kind of crap or do we all wind up rolling our own?
Reminds me a lot of the early days of fighting spam...though a ban on popups has already been mentioned in the US Congress. -- J.D. Falk a plenitude should not be wasted <jdfalk () cybernothing org>
Current thread:
- X-10 and like behaviour. George Michaelson (Jul 18)
- Re: X-10 and like behaviour. J.D. Falk (Jul 19)
- Re: X-10 and like behaviour. Frank Thomas (Jul 19)
- Re: X-10 and like behaviour. David Shaw (Jul 19)
- Re: X-10 and like behaviour. Greg Maxwell (Jul 19)
- Re: X-10 and like behaviour. David Shaw (Jul 19)
- Re: X-10 and like behaviour. William Allen Simpson (Jul 19)
- Re: X-10 and like behaviour. David Shaw (Jul 19)
- Re: X-10 and like behaviour. J.D. Falk (Jul 19)
- Re: X-10 and like behaviour. James Thomason (Jul 19)
- Re: X-10 and like behaviour. Daniel Senie (Jul 19)
- Re: X-10 and like behaviour. John Starta (Jul 19)
- Re: X-10 and like behaviour. Daniel Senie (Jul 19)