nanog mailing list archives

RE: Update: CSX train derailment


From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 18:36:14 -0700


From: up () 3 am [mailto:up () 3 am]
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 9:50 AM

On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Randy Bush wrote:

I would think that if fiber can be run across oceans 
without using tunnels
or bridges, that it could be run across some rivers much 
the same way, no?

the biggest exposure to cut for wet fiber is shallow water. 
 anchors,
idiots, ...

Yes, I can see that; but I imagine you could handle this much the way
fiber is handled near the shoreline.  Bury it a few feet 
under the mud or sand.

Not trivial when erosion makes huge changes in river beds. Please plot
changes in the lower Mississippi River for the past 200 years. Note the,
sometimes, seasonal changes. Note also, the regular changes in sand-bar
locations along the entire length of same river. It is definitely a more
chaotic environment than your average seashore.


Current thread: