nanog mailing list archives
Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () zocalo net>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 11:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
> > This of course kills all traffic... > Including the BGP session, I would think, thus causing it to reset and > drop the route, sending all the traffic back to the primary, which unfloods > the smaller link, which re-advertises, which... Which in turn can be fixed by adding a _third_ connection between the two routers, dedicated to advertising /32s, which the upstream/recipient then route-maps to set-next-hop to the second connection... :-) Sounds to me like we need itrace soon. -Bill
Current thread:
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Dan Foster (Jun 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Jim Shankland (Jun 01)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Walter Prue (Jun 01)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding lucifer (Jun 01)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Bill Woodcock (Jun 01)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Geoff Zinderdine (Jun 01)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Mark Mentovai (Jun 01)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Geoff Zinderdine (Jun 01)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 01)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Mark Mentovai (Jun 01)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding lucifer (Jun 01)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Hank Nussbacher (Jun 03)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Geoff Zinderdine (Jun 04)