nanog mailing list archives

Re: C&W Peering


From: "Vincent J. Bono" <vbono () vinny org>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:50:54 -0400


Any post filing expenses incurred (i.e. new contracts or payments due
current service providers for services provided after filing) must be
approved by the court and then they are given the highest priority for
payment, even above secured interests in the bankrupt entity.

-vb

----- Original Message -----
From: "Leo Bicknell" <bicknell () ufp org>
To: <nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 8:51 PM
Subject: Re: C&W Peering



On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 07:55:14PM -0400, Christopher A. Woodfield wrote:
I think PSI is going to have to get itself some transit, and quickly.

I know almost nothing about bankruptcy, so I would love for someone
who does to comment.  Put simply, if a company can't pay its
creditors and suppliers do they have any chance of entering into
a new purchase agreement?  I know that I personally wouldn't offer
them Net-30 payment terms right now.

--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org
Systems Engineer - Internetworking Engineer - CCIE 3440
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request () tmbg org, www.tmbg.org



Current thread: