nanog mailing list archives
Re: HTML-format postings
From: RJ Atkinson <rja () inet org>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 14:22:53 -0400
At 14:10 06/06/01, M. David Leonard wrote:
Am I the only one who objects to HTML-formatted postings on a listserv?
No. HTML format postings are just silly. I have a reasonably simple solution, which is to filter them out and not read them. No one who knows me anticipates that I'd actually read an HTML posting, so I am sure that such postings aren't intended for my eyes. :-) Ran
Current thread:
- Re: HTML-format postings, (continued)
- Re: HTML-format postings David Lesher (Jun 06)
- Re: HTML-format postings Todd Suiter (Jun 06)
- top/bottom posting [Re: HTML-format postings] Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 06)
- Re: top/bottom posting [Re: HTML-format postings] Pim van Riezen (Jun 06)
- Re: top/bottom posting [Re: HTML-format postings] Todd Suiter (Jun 06)
- Re: top/bottom posting [Re: HTML-format postings] John Payne (Jun 07)
- Re: top/bottom posting [Re: HTML-format postings] Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 07)
- Re: HTML-format postings David Lesher (Jun 06)
- Re: HTML-format postings Jonas Luster (Jun 06)
- Re: HTML-format postings Todd Suiter (Jun 06)
- Re: HTML-format postings John Fraizer (Jun 06)
- Re: HTML-format postings Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 06)
- Re: HTML-format postings Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 06)