nanog mailing list archives
Re: New peering criteria
From: Vijay Gill <vijay () umbc edu>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 16:17:45 -0400
On 6 Jun 2001, Sean Donelan wrote:
If you think it will hurt the other provider more than you, you'll terminate the agreement. If you think it will hurt you more, you'll fight to keep it in place.
If it will hurt you more than it will hurt them, then you aren't a really a "peer", and in that case, the disparity is resolved by the use of a service contract whereby you pay them money in exchange for connectivity. /vijay
Current thread:
- New peering criteria Sean Donelan (Jun 06)
- Re: New peering criteria Jeff Mcadams (Jun 06)
- Re: New peering criteria Vijay Gill (Jun 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: New peering criteria Sean Donelan (Jun 06)
- Re: New peering criteria Vijay Gill (Jun 06)
- Re: New peering criteria James Thomason (Jun 06)
- Re: New peering criteria [ and Enron ] James Thomason (Jun 06)
- Re: New peering criteria [ and Enron ] Geoff Huston (Jun 07)
- Re: New peering criteria [ and Enron ] hardie (Jun 07)
- Re: New peering criteria [ and Enron ] Steve Schaefer (Jun 07)
- Re: New peering criteria Vijay Gill (Jun 06)