nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why so little traffic from C&W
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk () cybernothing org>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:43:22 -0700
On 06/07/01, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se> wrote:
I believe the whole structure of tier1, tier2 etc is breaking down and everybody is going after all customers, and that this will have interesting implications in the future.
Breaking down? It used to be that anyone connected directly to an exchange point was tier one, and the tiers are pretty obvious beyond that. Now that everyone's at the exchanges, "tier one" is simply a marketing term. -- J.D. Falk SILENCE IS FOO! <jdfalk () cybernothing org>
Current thread:
- Why so little traffic from C&W Sean Donelan (Jun 06)
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W Paul Vixie (Jun 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 07)
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 07)
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W J.D. Falk (Jun 07)
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W Simon Lockhart (Jun 07)
- more tier 1 definitions was: Why so little traffic from C&W scott w (Jun 07)
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W Leo Bicknell (Jun 08)
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W bmanning (Jun 08)
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W Rachel Warren (Jun 10)
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W J.D. Falk (Jun 07)
- Re: Definition of Tier-1 RJ Atkinson (Jun 08)
- Re: Definition of Tier-1 E.B. Dreger (Jun 08)
- Re: Definition of Tier-1 Travis Pugh (Jun 08)
- non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1) E.B. Dreger (Jun 11)
- Re: non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1) Travis Pugh (Jun 11)