RE: /24s run amuck again

[John Starta <john () starta org>]

Your customers are paying for Internet connectivity. If they're unable to 
reach the sites they desire as a result of your intention actions 
(filtering announcements), why should they continue to pay you?

While I fully support and expect route aggregation whenever possible, it is 
unreasonable to believe that everything fits in nice pretty packages. If 
you're unwilling to accept diverse /22 announcements without payment, why 
should we not expect the same for the /24's you're announcing?

jas

At 11:56 AM 6/9/01 -0700, Randy Bush wrote:

> > There are lots of reasons to have some diverse /22 announcements in your
> > network for example.
>
> but if you are not paying me, what reasons are there for me to spend my
> resources (route bloat) so you can engineer your traffic?
>
> randy