nanog mailing list archives
RE: /24s run amuck again
From: Michael Whisenant <mwhisen () foreigner whisenant net>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 08:09:25 -0500 (CDT)
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Christian Nielsen wrote:
Exodus does care and Exodus is working on this problem. Ever try to get 500 customers to renumber? :)
If all they had was 500 it would not be that hard, and yes I have worked in a transistion of 500 customers that had to renumber. Take a few months, and a few will leave, but are we sure that this is going to be addressed, simply by a new owner? There could be a justification for the action, although I think that filtering based on the RIR allocation would be an quick and easy fix... but that is part of this thread already...
Current thread:
- RE: /24s run amuck again, (continued)
- RE: /24s run amuck again Randy Bush (Jun 09)
- RE: /24s run amuck again Geoff Huston (Jun 10)
- RE: /24s run amuck again David Schwartz (Jun 10)
- RE: /24s run amuck again Deepak Jain (Jun 10)
- RE: /24s run amuck again Randy Bush (Jun 10)
- Re: /24s run amuck again Bert Rossi (Jun 10)
- Message not available
- RE: /24s run amuck again Hank Nussbacher (Jun 10)
- RE: /24s run amuck again Dan Hollis (Jun 10)
- RE: /24s run amuck again Richard A. Steenbergen (Jun 10)
- RE: /24s run amuck again Christian Nielsen (Jun 10)
- RE: /24s run amuck again Michael Whisenant (Jun 10)
- RE: /24s run amuck again Jonathan Disher (Jun 11)