nanog mailing list archives
Re: non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1)
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk () cybernothing org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 19:18:53 -0700
On 06/11/01, "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net> wrote:
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 12:16:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Travis Pugh <tpugh () shore net> That sales BS is probably prompted by customers telling sales people that they won't buy service from anyone but a "tier 1" provider. This leads to many creative definitions of tier 1.So, how firm is the "transit-free" definition? (That's what I always thought was the proper definition, but it's been obliterated in the past couple of years...) Firm enough to slap abusers with false advertising suits? ;-P
Well, for one thing, "transit-free" doesn't mean that you can route to all the other "transit-free" providers.... -- J.D. Falk SILENCE IS FOO! <jdfalk () cybernothing org>
Current thread:
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W, (continued)
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W Simon Lockhart (Jun 07)
- more tier 1 definitions was: Why so little traffic from C&W scott w (Jun 07)
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W Leo Bicknell (Jun 08)
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W bmanning (Jun 08)
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W Rachel Warren (Jun 10)
- Re: Definition of Tier-1 RJ Atkinson (Jun 08)
- Re: Definition of Tier-1 E.B. Dreger (Jun 08)
- Re: Definition of Tier-1 Travis Pugh (Jun 08)
- non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1) E.B. Dreger (Jun 11)
- Re: non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1) Travis Pugh (Jun 11)
- Re: non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1) J.D. Falk (Jun 11)
- Re: non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1) Charles Sprickman (Jun 11)
- Re: non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1) bmanning (Jun 11)
- Re: Definition of Tier-1 J.D. Falk (Jun 08)
- Re: Definition of Tier-1 Austin Schutz (Jun 08)
- Re: Definition of Tier-1 Randy Bush (Jun 08)