Re: Opinions about InterNAP

["David McGaugh" <david_mcgaugh () eli net>]

/24's are sufficient to multihome with most if not all providers out
there. Why not conventionally multi-home to 2 large well established
providers?

-Dave

"Seth M. Kusiak" wrote:
> Hi
>
> We have a small network (5 /24’s) and we need to host our web applications
> internally because they access backend servers that absolutely cannot be
> collocated.  I am thinking about getting 2 T1’s or fractional DS3’s from
> InterNAP from different P-NAPS (1 from Philly and 1 from NY) each circuit
> from a different CO
>
> The reason that I’m thinking InterNAP is because we don’t qualify for a /20
> and we would not be able to efficiently multi-home. It seems that InterNAP
> is perfect in our situation because they buy transit from multiple providers
> and claim to not have any black holes in their network.
>
> I hear many great things about InterNAP and I hear the opposite as well.
>
> Any thoughts would GREATLY be appreciated
>
> Thanks!
>
>  -Seth

Attachment: dmcgaugh.vcf
Description: Card for David McGaugh