nanog mailing list archives
Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
From: "Christopher A. Woodfield" <rekoil () semihuman com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:36:36 -0400
Educate me: are you not at this time billing the customer for the local loop? Here in VZ territory, the cost of the local loop lease from VZ and the DSLAM access from Covad (in your case, SBC provides both of these, right?) are both rolled into the standard monthly fee from my ISP. Is this not how it's done in SBC land? -C
opportunity to also sell other services over that DSL circuit, and we are also made responsible for billing the DSL circuit to the customer. So in
-- --------------------------- Christopher A. Woodfield rekoil () semihuman com PGP Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB887618B
Current thread:
- SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Bruce Robertson (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Bruce Robertson (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Derek Balling (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Derek Balling (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Bruce Robertson (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Jeff Mcadams (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Derek Balling (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Dee McKinney (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Derek Balling (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Steven J. Sobol (Jun 26)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Bruce Robertson (Jun 25)