nanog mailing list archives
RE: Statements against new.net?
From: "Mark Radabaugh - Amplex" <mark () amplex net>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 13:18:51 -0500
BUT if representatives from a dozen or a hundred ISPs meet together and choose to blackhole new.net for the explicit purpose of running them out of business, and then do so, they would be in violation of US anti-trust laws. -- David
But what if a quasi-government organization (ICANN) explicitly blessed the concept of banning alternate roots :-) Now there is a can of worms... Mark Radabaugh Amplex (419) 833-3635
Current thread:
- Re: Statements against new.net?, (continued)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 13)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mathew Butler (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Roeland Meyer (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Roeland Meyer (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Roeland Meyer (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Roeland Meyer (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mathias Koerber (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? David Charlap (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mark Radabaugh - Amplex (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Edward S. Marshall (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Ron Snyder (Mar 15)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mathias Koerber (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Marshall Eubanks (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Mar 14)