nanog mailing list archives
RE: Statements against new.net?
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman () civicnet org>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 18:17:19 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Mathew Butler wrote:Adrian: The key word is "cooperating". New.net (and its brethren that are being born in technology incubators as we speak) are not "cooperating", they're intentionally "culture-jamming" for their own gain.Perhaps you might like to define "cooperating" for us? Has ICANN cooperated with the individuals and organizations that currently run alternate TLDs which predate the existence of ICANN? Or is it rather simply that "might makes right" and they only need to cooperate with "people that matter?"
At some point cooperation has to yield to due process - at least that's the history of society to date. Unless there's a major change to the Internet infrastructure, we need DNS to function reliably, and that requires that the root nameservers behave the way they're supposed to. Just as key pieces of the telephone system are REQUIRED to behave in certain ways - as negotiated through well defined and legally sanctioned processes, and enforced by the ITU and various national level authorities - so must key pieces of the Internet be under the jurisdiction of clearly defined processes and authorities. The Internet is no longer an experiment that people can mess around with with impunity. Right now, like it or not, ICANN is the duly authorized authority for Internet naming and numbering. Of course that's just my opinion, I could be wrong. ************************************************************************** The Center for Civic Networking PO Box 600618 Miles R. Fidelman, President & Newtonville, MA 02460-0006 Director, Municipal Telecommunications Strategies Program 617-558-3698 fax: 617-630-8946 mfidelman () civicnet org http://civic.net/ccn.html Information Infrastructure: Public Spaces for the 21st Century Let's Start With: Internet Wall-Plugs Everywhere Say It Often, Say It Loud: "I Want My Internet!" **************************************************************************
Current thread:
- Re: Statements against new.net?, (continued)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Marshall Eubanks (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Marshall Eubanks (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Sean Donelan (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Daryl G. Jurbala (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mathew Butler (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mathew Butler (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Vadim Antonov (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mathew Butler (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Adrian Chadd (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Patrick Greenwell (Mar 15)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Miles Fidelman (Mar 15)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Patrick Greenwell (Mar 15)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Miles Fidelman (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Miles Fidelman (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Howard C. Berkowitz (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Simon Higgs (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 17)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Jeff Workman (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? mdevney (Mar 16)