nanog mailing list archives
RE: rfc 3091,3092,3098
From: "Mark Radabaugh - Amplex" <mark () amplex net>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 21:56:20 -0400
Yes. but the html post is not. Mark -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Micah McNelly Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 9:53 PM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: rfc 3091,3092,3098 I am very unclear about the nature of the following rfcs: 3091 Pi Digit Generation Protocol 3098 How to Advertise Responsibly etc etc. 3092 Etymology of "Foo" Is this some kind of joke? I am seriously confused. /m
Current thread:
- rfc 3091,3092,3098 Micah McNelly (May 18)
- RE: rfc 3091,3092,3098 Mark Radabaugh - Amplex (May 18)
- Re: rfc 3091,3092,3098 Shawn McMahon (May 18)
- Re: rfc 3091,3092,3098 David Charlap (May 18)
- Re: rfc 3091,3092,3098 J.D. Falk (May 18)