nanog mailing list archives
Re: Stealth Blocking
From: Mitch Halmu <mitch () netside net>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 15:12:49 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Dave Rand wrote:
That's why I think that port 25 blocking is the only way. That, and closing open relays, of course.
No, that is NOT the only way. We presume that the spammer had 8 dial-up accounts. Who is this professional spammer, and how come he/she/it can still find a provider? That is the question. Perhaps also who is the merchant that ordered the promotion? The identity of such individual or company belongs on a black list. Yet the spammer is able to subscribe again tomorrow, next week, next year... and nothing happens to them. That is the point where control should be exercised. --Mitch NetSide
Current thread:
- Re: Stealth Blocking, (continued)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Jeremy T. Bouse (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Dan Hollis (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Dave Rand (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Eric A. Hall (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Scott Francis (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Eric A. Hall (May 24)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Roeland Meyer (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Eric A. Hall (May 24)
- Re: Why are you all still here? (Was Re: Stealth Blocking) Adam Rothschild (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Dave Rand (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Eric A. Hall (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Mitch Halmu (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking J.D. Falk (May 25)
- RE: Stealth Blocking Roeland Meyer (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Dave Rand (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Randy Bush (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Dave Rand (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Valdis . Kletnieks (May 24)
- "Big Red" Tim Langdell, PhD (May 24)
- Re: "Big Red" Mitch Halmu (May 24)
- Re: "Big Red" Aaron (May 25)
- Re: "Big Red" Scott Francis (May 25)
- "Big Red" Tim Langdell, PhD (May 24)