nanog mailing list archives
Re: 214/8 and 215/8
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 16:53:05 +0000 (UCT)
Hi - 214/8 and 215/8 seem to have been allocated to the U.S. DoD in ca. 1998. There does seem to be a few sizeable announcements (which overlap a few not-so-sizable ones), but I have to wonder if anyone can explain the grounds on which they were allocated these two /8s, and which body did the allocation. Anyone? Sean.I could. Why does it matter?Oh, openness, transparency, that sort of thing. Nothing really important. Nigel
These were delegated on the return of nets 49 and 50, along w/ about a /9 of mixed /16 and /24 space. e.g. an overall reduction in the amount of space. Jon Postel, as the IANA, approved the transfers. At that time, ARIN did not have control over legacy delegations. --bill
Current thread:
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 bmanning (Oct 31)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Nigel Titley (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Joe Abley (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Christopher A. Woodfield (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 John Kristoff (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Eliot Lear (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Simon Lyall (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 bmanning (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Joe Abley (Nov 01)
- RE: 214/8 and 215/8 Daniel Golding (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Nigel Titley (Nov 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Joe Provo (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Sean M. Doran (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Sean M. Doran (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 bmanning (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Philip Smith (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 01)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 bmanning (Nov 01)