nanog mailing list archives
Re: wireless traffic
From: Rodney Thayer <rodney () tillerman to>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 09:37:39 -0800
but the AUI header was assigned back when it was aironet. 3com, as it exists now, is in fact an old terminal server company called Bridge, which mutated into a router company, which got bought by this silly little pc ethernet card vendor called 3Com, etc.etc.etc. At 12:11 AM 11/10/2001 -0500, Andrew Brown wrote:
>lucent and aironet (later cisco) never made wired cards so >I wouldn't expect that. also, I think that the non-ieee lists >tend to have more/better data on prefixs. I bet snort or etherpeek >or ethereal or sniffer or someone like that has a decent aui list. they might never have made cards you could plug into your pc or mac, per se, but cisco at least has made quite a name for itself by manufacturing a large pile of *other* networking equipment. a fair amount of which uses the same addressing style.
Current thread:
- wireless traffic Art Houle (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Andrew Brown (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Antony (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Andy Ellifson (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Rodney Thayer (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Kevin Oberman (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Rodney Thayer (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Andrew Brown (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Rodney Thayer (Nov 11)
- Re: wireless traffic Kevin Oberman (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: wireless traffic Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Spencer . Wood (Nov 09)
- RE: wireless traffic Dave O'Shea (Nov 09)
- RE: wireless traffic measl (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Andrew Brown (Nov 09)