nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches
From: Rich Fulton <rich () bengi exodus net>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 02:16:18 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Randy Bush wrote:
you are not going to change their minds, as they have little of them left. just plonk them or hit delete. thanks.
you know, these days i'm not sure which number is higher.. those who plonk or those who post. /rf
Current thread:
- RE: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches), (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Simon Higgs (Nov 27)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Simon Higgs (Nov 27)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 19)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Simon Higgs (Nov 19)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Joel Baker (Nov 18)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Randy Bush (Nov 18)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Rich Fulton (Nov 18)