nanog mailing list archives
Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:03:11 -0500
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 06:56:40PM +0200, Rafi Sadowsky wrote:
Says who ? - maybe you didn't check the right one ?
Perhaps I should restate my complaint a bit. I think all three of these stand on their own. * If sub-bits of an allocation are in the ARIN database, I think the supernet should be in the ARIN database. * ARIN seems to have a good many, if not all of the .MIL supernets, but doesn't have this one. * Having .MIL say they have address space is not proof that they own the whole block, anymore than www.ufp.org saying I now own 20 class A's is proof that they are mine. In any event, I'd just like network lookups to work in some sane way, so when operators need to check something they can get accurate results. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request () tmbg org, www.tmbg.org
Current thread:
- 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Leo Bicknell (Nov 27)
- Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Rafi Sadowsky (Nov 27)
- RE: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Matt Levine (Nov 27)
- Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Leo Bicknell (Nov 27)
- Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Philip Smith (Nov 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Borchers, Mark (Nov 27)
- Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 27)
- Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Philip Smith (Nov 28)
- Re: 132.0.0.0/10 not in the databases Rafi Sadowsky (Nov 27)