nanog mailing list archives
RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out
From: "Quibell, Marc" <mquibell () icn state ia us>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 14:16:02 -0500
Maybe you should ping NS01.ARMY.MIL about 2400 times in 3 hour and see if you don't get a visit? Pinging a website 2 times means nothing.. Marc -----Original Message----- From: James Thomason [mailto:james () divide org] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:51 PM To: Dan Hollis Cc: Mike Batchelor; nanog () merit edu Subject: RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out PING www.army.mil (140.183.234.10): 56 data bytes ^C --- www.army.mil ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss Am I a terrorist now too? On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Dan Hollis wrote:
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Mike Batchelor wrote:<rant> Digital Island is certainly not alone in their practice of assuming an opt-in stance.I think you know that for an operation like Digital Island or Akamai,
asking
every network operator permission to probe is for all practical
purposes,
impossible. Insisting on opt-in is insisting on these companies going
out
of business, or not even starting up at all.I wonder if Digital Island "probes" .mil sites. -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
Current thread:
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out Quibell, Marc (Oct 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 26)
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out James Thomason (Oct 26)
- Re: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out Owen DeLong (Oct 26)
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out James Thomason (Oct 26)
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out Quibell, Marc (Oct 26)
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out James Thomason (Oct 26)
- Re: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out Stephen Griffin (Oct 28)