nanog mailing list archives
Re: Afghanistan [OT]
From: David VanHorn <dvanhorn () cedar net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 11:21:38 -0500
At 11:51 PM 9/19/01 +0800, Ng Pheng Siong wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 03:48:53PM -0700, Vadim Antonov wrote: > I'd say the better way of communicating would be the classical > native-language radio translation in Radio Liberty/Radio Free Europe > fashion, otherwise known as propaganda. Worked well for the USSR. You mean _against_ the USSR?
No, just against the communist government :) -- Dave's Engineering Page: http://www.dvanhorn.orgI would have a link to http://www.findu.com/cgi-bin/find.cgi?KC6ETE-9 here in my signature line, but due to the inability of sysadmins at TELOCITY to differentiate a signature line from the text of an email, I am forbidden to have it.
Current thread:
- Re: Afghanistan, (continued)
- Re: Afghanistan Richard Welty (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Basil Kruglov (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Randy Bush (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Todd Suiter (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Todd Suiter (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan [OT] Vadim Antonov (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan [OT] Curtis Maurand (Sep 19)
- Re: Afghanistan [OT] Ng Pheng Siong (Sep 19)
- Re: Afghanistan [OT] David VanHorn (Sep 19)
- Re: Afghanistan Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Nathan J . Mehl (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Tim Devries (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Marshall Eubanks (Sep 18)
- RE: Afghanistan ginny listman (Sep 19)