nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al.
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () gitoyen net>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 14:00:56 +0200
On Friday 28 September 2001, at 15 h 15, "Joel Baker" <lucifer () lightbearer com> wrote:
Zebra: OSPF is twitchy, BGP is either great or takes > 1 hour to converge a full table,
Never seen that.
with no clear reason why, and it does not support anything but Linux/Intel sanely, yet.
I use Zebra only on Linux/Intel, so it does not bother me. But I know personnally several people who run it happily on FreeBSD/Intel and the Zebra mailing list clearly show that most Zebraers seem to prefer *BSD to run it.
Current thread:
- BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Joel Baker (Sep 28)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Dan Hollis (Sep 28)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Joel Baker (Sep 28)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. matthew zeier (Sep 28)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Jason Legate (Sep 28)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Peter Galbavy (Sep 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Stephane Bortzmeyer (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Stephane Bortzmeyer (Sep 30)
- Re: BGP tables, PC hardware, et al. Dan Hollis (Sep 28)